Romania vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government) over time
- Romania
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.87 million USD against 0.57 million USD in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.3 million USD.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.5 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 68th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 69th of 79 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.525 million USD | 0.35 million USD | 0.175 million USD | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.5767 million USD | 0.4633 million USD | 0.1133 million USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government), Romania or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Romania, at 0.87 million USD against 0.57 million USD in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government) between Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.3 million USD, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government)?
- Romania ranks 68th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 69th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.