Canada vs Ecuador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Canada
5.97 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
5.2 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
89th
Ecuador rank
91st

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • Ecuador
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 5.97 kg per square kilometre against 5.2 kg per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.77 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Canada ranks 89th and Ecuador ranks 91st of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 2.29 kg per square kilometre 7.56 kg per square kilometre 5.27 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 2.9 kg per square kilometre 11.98 kg per square kilometre 9.08 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 4.32 kg per square kilometre 13.21 kg per square kilometre 8.89 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 4.68 kg per square kilometre 12 kg per square kilometre 7.33 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 5.87 kg per square kilometre 7.44 kg per square kilometre 1.57 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 5.57 kg per square kilometre 7.38 kg per square kilometre 1.8 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 6.01 kg per square kilometre 5.34 kg per square kilometre 0.6641 kg per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Canada or Ecuador?
Canada, at 5.97 kg per square kilometre against 5.2 kg per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Canada and Ecuador?
0.77 kg per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Ecuador rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 89th and Ecuador ranks 91st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Ecuador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/canada/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/canada/ecuador/">Canada vs Ecuador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.