Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre was 5.2 kg per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg per square kilometre.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 5.2 kg per square kilometre for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre in 2023.
The figure is up 4.3% on the previous year and down 19.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 17.99 kg per square kilometre in 1984 and was at its lowest, 4.99 kg per square kilometre, in 2022.
Ecuador ranks 91st of 149 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | kg per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 6.36 kg per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 6.69 kg per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1963 | 7.03 kg per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1964 | 7.11 kg per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1965 | 7.45 kg per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1966 | 7.83 kg per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1967 | 8.21 kg per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1968 | 8.59 kg per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1969 | 8.8 kg per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1970 | 9.11 kg per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1971 | 9.39 kg per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1972 | 9.71 kg per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1973 | 10.44 kg per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1974 | 11.22 kg per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1975 | 12.06 kg per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1976 | 12.97 kg per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1977 | 13.92 kg per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1978 | 14.94 kg per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1979 | 16.06 kg per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1980 | 16.83 kg per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1981 | 15.74 kg per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1982 | 16.7 kg per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1983 | 17.72 kg per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1984 | 17.99 kg per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1985 | 11.69 kg per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 1986 | 8.74 kg per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1987 | 7.68 kg per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1988 | 9.12 kg per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1989 | 9.92 kg per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1990 | 10.53 kg per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1991 | 11.04 kg per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1992 | 11.5 kg per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1993 | 11.67 kg per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1994 | 12.08 kg per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1995 | 12.43 kg per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1996 | 12.43 kg per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 12.84 kg per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1998 | 14.32 kg per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1999 | 11.2 kg per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 2000 | 8.07 kg per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 2001 | 7.41 kg per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2002 | 7.55 kg per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2003 | 7.45 kg per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2004 | 6.78 kg per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2005 | 6.77 kg per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2006 | 10.11 kg per square kilometre | +49.3% |
| 2007 | 7 kg per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 2008 | 5.8 kg per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2009 | 7.44 kg per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 2010 | 7.88 kg per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2011 | 9.68 kg per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2012 | 6.14 kg per square kilometre | -36.5% |
| 2013 | 6.44 kg per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2014 | 10.1 kg per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 2015 | 8.66 kg per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2016 | 6.03 kg per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 2017 | 5.9 kg per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2018 | 6.79 kg per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2019 | 6.15 kg per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2020 | 5.6 kg per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2021 | 5.57 kg per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2022 | 4.99 kg per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2023 | 5.2 kg per square kilometre | +4.3% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 5.2 kg per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 10.55 kg per square kilometre, 49% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 5.2 kg per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 8.16 kg per square kilometre, 64% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | +56.8% | 6.44 kg per square kilometre | 10.1 kg per square kilometre |
| 2006 | +49.3% | 6.77 kg per square kilometre | 10.11 kg per square kilometre |
| 2012 | -36.5% | 9.68 kg per square kilometre | 6.14 kg per square kilometre |
| 1985 | -35.0% | 17.99 kg per square kilometre | 11.69 kg per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.56 kg per square kilometre | 6.36 kg per square kilometre | 8.8 kg per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 11.98 kg per square kilometre | 9.11 kg per square kilometre | 16.06 kg per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 13.21 kg per square kilometre | 7.68 kg per square kilometre | 17.99 kg per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 12 kg per square kilometre | 10.53 kg per square kilometre | 14.32 kg per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.44 kg per square kilometre | 5.8 kg per square kilometre | 10.11 kg per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.38 kg per square kilometre | 5.9 kg per square kilometre | 10.1 kg per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.34 kg per square kilometre | 4.99 kg per square kilometre | 5.6 kg per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 88 Puerto Rico 6.15 kg per square kilometre compare
- 89 Canada 5.97 kg per square kilometre compare
- 90 Honduras 5.48 kg per square kilometre compare
- 92 Burkina Faso 5.01 kg per square kilometre compare
- 93 Chile 4.98 kg per square kilometre compare
- 94 New Zealand 4.49 kg per square kilometre compare
More environment data for Ecuador
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 0.3767 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.05 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.4 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.49 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate -0.5742 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 1.65 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -1.14 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre in Ecuador was 5.2 kg per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 17.99 kg per square kilometre in 1984.
- What is the lowest swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.99 kg per square kilometre in 2022.
- How does Ecuador rank for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 91st out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Swine — Losses from manure treated Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.