Ecuador vs New Zealand: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Ecuador
5.2 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
4.49 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
91st
New Zealand rank
94th

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Zealand
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 5.2 kg per square kilometre against 4.49 kg per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.71 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Ecuador ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 94th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 7.56 kg per square kilometre 12.05 kg per square kilometre 4.49 kg per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 11.98 kg per square kilometre 8.63 kg per square kilometre 3.35 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 13.21 kg per square kilometre 7.63 kg per square kilometre 5.58 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 12 kg per square kilometre 7.22 kg per square kilometre 4.79 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 7.44 kg per square kilometre 6.37 kg per square kilometre 1.07 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 7.38 kg per square kilometre 5.22 kg per square kilometre 2.16 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 5.34 kg per square kilometre 4.53 kg per square kilometre 0.8075 kg per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Ecuador or New Zealand?
Ecuador, at 5.2 kg per square kilometre against 4.49 kg per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Ecuador and New Zealand?
0.71 kg per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 94th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Zealand: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/new-zealand/">Ecuador vs New Zealand: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.