Ecuador vs Suriname: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita

Ecuador
0.725 kg per person
in 2023
Suriname
0.7055 kg per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
72nd
Suriname rank
75th

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • Suriname
0246196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.725 kg per person against 0.7055 kg per person in Suriname, a difference of 0.0195 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 72nd and Suriname ranks 75th of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 3.96 kg per person 0.3798 kg per person 3.58 kg per person Ecuador
1970s 4.72 kg per person 0.5773 kg per person 4.14 kg per person Ecuador
1980s 4.11 kg per person 0.7009 kg per person 3.4 kg per person Ecuador
1990s 2.86 kg per person 0.8242 kg per person 2.04 kg per person Ecuador
2000s 1.36 kg per person 0.6668 kg per person 0.695 kg per person Ecuador
2010s 1.15 kg per person 0.7809 kg per person 0.3688 kg per person Ecuador
2020s 0.754 kg per person 0.7296 kg per person 0.0244 kg per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita, Ecuador or Suriname?
Ecuador, at 0.725 kg per person against 0.7055 kg per person in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita between Ecuador and Suriname?
0.0195 kg per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Suriname rank globally for swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita?
Ecuador ranks 72nd and Suriname ranks 75th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Suriname: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/suriname/">Ecuador vs Suriname: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.