Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita in Ecuador

Ecuador: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita was 0.725 kg per person in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.725 kg per person
Change on year
up 3.4%
World rank
72nd
of 149 countries
All-time high
5.76 kg per person
in 1980
All-time low
0.7011 kg per person
in 2022
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita in Ecuador, 1961–2023

0246196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg per person.

Analysis

The most recent figure for swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita in Ecuador is 0.725 kg per person, measured in 2023.

The figure is up 3.4% on the previous year and down 29.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita in Ecuador peaked at 5.76 kg per person in 1980 and was at its lowest, 0.7011 kg per person, in 2022.

Ecuador ranks 72nd of 149 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita in Ecuador, 1961 to 2023.
Year kg per person Change
1961 3.76 kg per person —
1962 3.84 kg per person +2.3%
1963 3.93 kg per person +2.2%
1964 3.86 kg per person -1.8%
1965 3.92 kg per person +1.6%
1966 4 kg per person +2.0%
1967 4.07 kg per person +1.8%
1968 4.13 kg per person +1.5%
1969 4.11 kg per person -0.5%
1970 4.13 kg per person +0.5%
1971 4.14 kg per person +0.1%
1972 4.15 kg per person +0.4%
1973 4.34 kg per person +4.4%
1974 4.53 kg per person +4.5%
1975 4.73 kg per person +4.5%
1976 4.95 kg per person +4.5%
1977 5.17 kg per person +4.4%
1978 5.39 kg per person +4.4%
1979 5.64 kg per person +4.6%
1980 5.76 kg per person +2.1%
1981 5.24 kg per person -9.0%
1982 5.42 kg per person +3.3%
1983 5.6 kg per person +3.4%
1984 5.54 kg per person -1.1%
1985 3.51 kg per person -36.7%
1986 2.56 kg per person -27.1%
1987 2.19 kg per person -14.2%
1988 2.54 kg per person +15.9%
1989 2.71 kg per person +6.4%
1990 2.81 kg per person +3.8%
1991 2.88 kg per person +2.6%
1992 2.94 kg per person +2.0%
1993 2.92 kg per person -0.6%
1994 2.97 kg per person +1.5%
1995 2.99 kg per person +1.0%
1996 2.94 kg per person -1.8%
1997 2.98 kg per person +1.4%
1998 2.93 kg per person -1.8%
1999 2.25 kg per person -23.2%
2000 1.59 kg per person -29.1%
2001 1.44 kg per person -9.8%
2002 1.44 kg per person +0.1%
2003 1.4 kg per person -3.0%
2004 1.25 kg per person -10.6%
2005 1.23 kg per person -1.8%
2006 1.8 kg per person +46.7%
2007 1.22 kg per person -32.0%
2008 0.9974 kg per person -18.5%
2009 1.26 kg per person +26.0%
2010 1.31 kg per person +4.2%
2011 1.58 kg per person +20.9%
2012 0.9885 kg per person -37.5%
2013 1.02 kg per person +3.3%
2014 1.58 kg per person +54.5%
2015 1.33 kg per person -15.5%
2016 0.916 kg per person -31.3%
2017 0.8818 kg per person -3.7%
2018 0.9972 kg per person +13.1%
2019 0.8883 kg per person -10.9%
2020 0.8002 kg per person -9.9%
2021 0.7896 kg per person -1.3%
2022 0.7011 kg per person -11.2%
2023 0.725 kg per person +3.4%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 0.725 kg per person is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.725 kg per person, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 0.725 kg per person is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1 kg per person, 72% of the median. (32 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2014 +54.5% 1.02 kg per person 1.58 kg per person
2006 +46.7% 1.23 kg per person 1.8 kg per person
2012 -37.5% 1.58 kg per person 0.9885 kg per person
1985 -36.7% 5.54 kg per person 3.51 kg per person
2007 -32.0% 1.8 kg per person 1.22 kg per person
2016 -31.3% 1.33 kg per person 0.916 kg per person

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 3.96 kg per person 3.76 kg per person 4.13 kg per person 9
1970s 4.72 kg per person 4.13 kg per person 5.64 kg per person 10
1980s 4.11 kg per person 2.19 kg per person 5.76 kg per person 10
1990s 2.86 kg per person 2.25 kg per person 2.99 kg per person 10
2000s 1.36 kg per person 0.9974 kg per person 1.8 kg per person 10
2010s 1.15 kg per person 0.8818 kg per person 1.58 kg per person 10
2020s 0.754 kg per person 0.7011 kg per person 0.8002 kg per person 4

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 69 Sweden 0.7318 kg per person compare
  2. 70 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.7312 kg per person compare
  3. 71 Antigua and Barbuda 0.7277 kg per person compare
  4. 73 Belize 0.7222 kg per person compare
  5. 74 Liberia 0.7111 kg per person compare
  6. 75 Suriname 0.7055 kg per person compare

See the full ranking of 151 places →

More environment data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita in Ecuador?
Swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita in Ecuador was 0.725 kg per person in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 5.76 kg per person in 1980.
What is the lowest swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 0.7011 kg per person in 2022.
How does Ecuador rank for swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita?
Ecuador ranks 72nd out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
Is swine, market — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 29.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/">Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content) ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.