Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Cape Verde
1.74 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Sri Lanka
1.7 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
160th
Sri Lanka rank
162nd

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Sri Lanka
0.511.52197019972024

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 1.74 t CO2e/capita against 1.7 t CO2e/capita in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.04 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 160th and Sri Lanka ranks 162nd of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 0.8118 t CO2e/capita 0.8098 t CO2e/capita 0.002 t CO2e/capita Cape Verde
1980s 0.5746 t CO2e/capita 0.8475 t CO2e/capita 0.2729 t CO2e/capita Sri Lanka
1990s 0.6796 t CO2e/capita 1.04 t CO2e/capita 0.3612 t CO2e/capita Sri Lanka
2000s 1.5 t CO2e/capita 1.21 t CO2e/capita 0.2912 t CO2e/capita Cape Verde
2010s 1.98 t CO2e/capita 1.51 t CO2e/capita 0.4733 t CO2e/capita Cape Verde
2020s 1.7 t CO2e/capita 1.62 t CO2e/capita 0.0826 t CO2e/capita Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Cape Verde or Sri Lanka?
Cape Verde, at 1.74 t CO2e/capita against 1.7 t CO2e/capita in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?
0.04 t CO2e/capita, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Sri Lanka rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Cape Verde ranks 160th and Sri Lanka ranks 162nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/cabo-verde/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/cabo-verde/sri-lanka/">Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.