Caribbean Small States vs Mongolia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Caribbean Small States
11.33 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Mongolia
29.61 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Caribbean Small States rank
3rd
Mongolia rank
5th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Caribbean Small States
  • Mongolia
51015202530197019972024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 29.61 t CO2e/capita against 11.33 t CO2e/capita in Caribbean Small States, a difference of 18.28 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.6 times Caribbean Small States's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mongolia ahead.

Caribbean Small States ranks 3rd and Mongolia ranks 5th of 47 groups.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Small States Mongolia Difference Ahead
1970s 5.58 t CO2e/capita 14.74 t CO2e/capita 9.17 t CO2e/capita Mongolia
1980s 6.28 t CO2e/capita 14.36 t CO2e/capita 8.07 t CO2e/capita Mongolia
1990s 7.18 t CO2e/capita 13.02 t CO2e/capita 5.84 t CO2e/capita Mongolia
2000s 11.42 t CO2e/capita 11.88 t CO2e/capita 0.4602 t CO2e/capita Mongolia
2010s 12.93 t CO2e/capita 19.06 t CO2e/capita 6.13 t CO2e/capita Mongolia
2020s 11.42 t CO2e/capita 24.04 t CO2e/capita 12.63 t CO2e/capita Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Caribbean Small States or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 29.61 t CO2e/capita against 11.33 t CO2e/capita in Caribbean Small States as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Caribbean Small States and Mongolia?
18.28 t CO2e/capita, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean Small States and Mongolia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Caribbean Small States and Mongolia rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Caribbean Small States ranks 3rd and Mongolia ranks 5th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean Small States vs Mongolia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/caribbean-small-states/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/caribbean-small-states/mongolia/">Caribbean Small States vs Mongolia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.