Côte d'Ivoire vs Uganda: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Côte d'Ivoire
1.19 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Uganda
1.15 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Côte d'Ivoire rank
177th
Uganda rank
179th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Uganda
00.250.50.7511.2197019972024

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 1.19 t CO2e/capita against 1.15 t CO2e/capita in Uganda, a difference of 0.04 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 179th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 1.12 t CO2e/capita 1.06 t CO2e/capita 0.0541 t CO2e/capita Côte d'Ivoire
1980s 1.02 t CO2e/capita 0.9176 t CO2e/capita 0.1023 t CO2e/capita Côte d'Ivoire
1990s 0.8412 t CO2e/capita 0.8416 t CO2e/capita 0.0004 t CO2e/capita Uganda
2000s 0.8764 t CO2e/capita 0.8886 t CO2e/capita 0.0122 t CO2e/capita Uganda
2010s 1 t CO2e/capita 1.14 t CO2e/capita 0.1362 t CO2e/capita Uganda
2020s 1.16 t CO2e/capita 1.15 t CO2e/capita 0.0056 t CO2e/capita Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Côte d'Ivoire or Uganda?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 1.19 t CO2e/capita against 1.15 t CO2e/capita in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda?
0.04 t CO2e/capita, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 179th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Uganda: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/cote-d-ivoire/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/cote-d-ivoire/uganda/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Uganda: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.