Euro area vs Kazakhstan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Euro area
6.89 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Kazakhstan
16.04 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Euro area rank
16th
Kazakhstan rank
17th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Euro area
  • Kazakhstan
510152025197019972024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 16.04 t CO2e/capita against 6.89 t CO2e/capita in Euro area, a difference of 9.15 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 2.3 times Euro area's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 16th and Kazakhstan ranks 17th of 47 groups.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1970s 11.87 t CO2e/capita 22.16 t CO2e/capita 10.29 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
1980s 11.55 t CO2e/capita 20.19 t CO2e/capita 8.64 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
1990s 10.78 t CO2e/capita 15.47 t CO2e/capita 4.7 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
2000s 10.44 t CO2e/capita 14.53 t CO2e/capita 4.09 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
2010s 8.89 t CO2e/capita 16.82 t CO2e/capita 7.93 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
2020s 7.36 t CO2e/capita 15.89 t CO2e/capita 8.53 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Euro area or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 16.04 t CO2e/capita against 6.89 t CO2e/capita in Euro area as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Euro area and Kazakhstan?
9.15 t CO2e/capita, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Kazakhstan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Euro area and Kazakhstan rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Euro area ranks 16th and Kazakhstan ranks 17th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Kazakhstan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/euro-area/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/euro-area/kazakhstan/">Euro area vs Kazakhstan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.