Gibraltar vs Kazakhstan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Gibraltar
16.75 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Kazakhstan
16.04 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
16th
Kazakhstan rank
17th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Kazakhstan
0510152025197019972024

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 16.75 t CO2e/capita against 16.04 t CO2e/capita in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.71 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 16th and Kazakhstan ranks 17th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1970s 2.77 t CO2e/capita 22.16 t CO2e/capita 19.39 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
1980s 4.27 t CO2e/capita 20.19 t CO2e/capita 15.92 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
1990s 10.18 t CO2e/capita 15.47 t CO2e/capita 5.29 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
2000s 14.25 t CO2e/capita 14.53 t CO2e/capita 0.2855 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
2010s 17.75 t CO2e/capita 16.82 t CO2e/capita 0.9245 t CO2e/capita Gibraltar
2020s 17.52 t CO2e/capita 15.89 t CO2e/capita 1.63 t CO2e/capita Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Gibraltar or Kazakhstan?
Gibraltar, at 16.75 t CO2e/capita against 16.04 t CO2e/capita in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Gibraltar and Kazakhstan?
0.71 t CO2e/capita, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Kazakhstan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Gibraltar and Kazakhstan rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Gibraltar ranks 16th and Kazakhstan ranks 17th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Kazakhstan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/gibraltar/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/gibraltar/kazakhstan/">Gibraltar vs Kazakhstan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.