Greenland vs Singapore: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Greenland
11.6 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Singapore
12.6 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Greenland rank
25th
Singapore rank
23rd

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Greenland
  • Singapore
051015197019972024

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 12.6 t CO2e/capita against 11.6 t CO2e/capita in Greenland, a difference of 1 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Singapore ahead.

Greenland ranks 25th and Singapore ranks 23rd of 203 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 1.15 t CO2e/capita 5.37 t CO2e/capita 4.22 t CO2e/capita Singapore
1980s 1.12 t CO2e/capita 7.53 t CO2e/capita 6.41 t CO2e/capita Singapore
1990s 1.09 t CO2e/capita 12.7 t CO2e/capita 11.61 t CO2e/capita Singapore
2000s 7.53 t CO2e/capita 12.06 t CO2e/capita 4.53 t CO2e/capita Singapore
2010s 10.82 t CO2e/capita 11.7 t CO2e/capita 0.875 t CO2e/capita Singapore
2020s 11.19 t CO2e/capita 12.5 t CO2e/capita 1.32 t CO2e/capita Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Greenland or Singapore?
Singapore, at 12.6 t CO2e/capita against 11.6 t CO2e/capita in Greenland as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Greenland and Singapore?
1 t CO2e/capita, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Singapore?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Greenland and Singapore rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Greenland ranks 25th and Singapore ranks 23rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Singapore: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/greenland/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/greenland/singapore/">Greenland vs Singapore: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.