High income vs Mongolia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

High income
12.5 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Mongolia
29.61 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
High income rank
2nd
Mongolia rank
5th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • High income
  • Mongolia
1015202530197019972024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 29.61 t CO2e/capita against 12.5 t CO2e/capita in High income, a difference of 17.11 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.4 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was High income ahead.

High income ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 5th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, High income averaged higher in 4 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Mongolia Difference Ahead
1970s 16.06 t CO2e/capita 14.74 t CO2e/capita 1.32 t CO2e/capita High income
1980s 15.73 t CO2e/capita 14.36 t CO2e/capita 1.37 t CO2e/capita High income
1990s 15.35 t CO2e/capita 13.02 t CO2e/capita 2.34 t CO2e/capita High income
2000s 15.13 t CO2e/capita 11.88 t CO2e/capita 3.25 t CO2e/capita High income
2010s 13.95 t CO2e/capita 19.06 t CO2e/capita 5.12 t CO2e/capita Mongolia
2020s 12.72 t CO2e/capita 24.04 t CO2e/capita 11.32 t CO2e/capita Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, High income or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 29.61 t CO2e/capita against 12.5 t CO2e/capita in High income as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between High income and Mongolia?
17.11 t CO2e/capita, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Mongolia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do High income and Mongolia rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
High income ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 5th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Mongolia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/high-income/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/high-income/mongolia/">High income vs Mongolia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.