Hong Kong, China vs Romania: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Hong Kong, China
5.36 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Romania
5.35 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
79th
Romania rank
81st

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Romania
24681012197019972024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 5.36 t CO2e/capita against 5.35 t CO2e/capita in Romania, a difference of 0.01 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Romania ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 79th and Romania ranks 81st of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Romania Difference Ahead
1970s 3.31 t CO2e/capita 10.06 t CO2e/capita 6.75 t CO2e/capita Romania
1980s 5.29 t CO2e/capita 11.8 t CO2e/capita 6.51 t CO2e/capita Romania
1990s 7.21 t CO2e/capita 7.59 t CO2e/capita 0.3888 t CO2e/capita Romania
2000s 6.97 t CO2e/capita 6.4 t CO2e/capita 0.5658 t CO2e/capita Hong Kong, China
2010s 6.86 t CO2e/capita 5.8 t CO2e/capita 1.06 t CO2e/capita Hong Kong, China
2020s 5.29 t CO2e/capita 5.57 t CO2e/capita 0.2792 t CO2e/capita Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Hong Kong, China or Romania?
Hong Kong, China, at 5.36 t CO2e/capita against 5.35 t CO2e/capita in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Hong Kong, China and Romania?
0.01 t CO2e/capita, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Romania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Romania rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Hong Kong, China ranks 79th and Romania ranks 81st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Romania: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/romania/">Hong Kong, China vs Romania: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.