IDA blend vs South Africa: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

IDA blend
2.02 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
South Africa
8.9 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
IDA blend rank
37th
South Africa rank
39th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • IDA blend
  • South Africa
24681012197019972024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 8.9 t CO2e/capita against 2.02 t CO2e/capita in IDA blend, a difference of 6.88 t CO2e/capita.

That makes South Africa's figure about 4.4 times IDA blend's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

IDA blend ranks 37th and South Africa ranks 39th of 47 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 2.77 t CO2e/capita 10.96 t CO2e/capita 8.19 t CO2e/capita South Africa
1980s 2.47 t CO2e/capita 10.55 t CO2e/capita 8.08 t CO2e/capita South Africa
1990s 2.5 t CO2e/capita 9.6 t CO2e/capita 7.1 t CO2e/capita South Africa
2000s 2.28 t CO2e/capita 10.69 t CO2e/capita 8.41 t CO2e/capita South Africa
2010s 2.08 t CO2e/capita 10.57 t CO2e/capita 8.5 t CO2e/capita South Africa
2020s 2.04 t CO2e/capita 9.1 t CO2e/capita 7.05 t CO2e/capita South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, IDA blend or South Africa?
South Africa, at 8.9 t CO2e/capita against 2.02 t CO2e/capita in IDA blend as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between IDA blend and South Africa?
6.88 t CO2e/capita, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and South Africa?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do IDA blend and South Africa rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
IDA blend ranks 37th and South Africa ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs South Africa: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/ida-blend/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/ida-blend/south-africa/">IDA blend vs South Africa: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.