Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Kazakhstan
16.04 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
New Zealand
14.71 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
17th
New Zealand rank
19th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • New Zealand
0510152025197019972024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 16.04 t CO2e/capita against 14.71 t CO2e/capita in New Zealand, a difference of 1.33 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 19th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 22.16 t CO2e/capita 20.54 t CO2e/capita 1.62 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan
1980s 20.19 t CO2e/capita 21.32 t CO2e/capita 1.12 t CO2e/capita New Zealand
1990s 15.47 t CO2e/capita 20.98 t CO2e/capita 5.51 t CO2e/capita New Zealand
2000s 14.53 t CO2e/capita 21.04 t CO2e/capita 6.51 t CO2e/capita New Zealand
2010s 16.82 t CO2e/capita 18.7 t CO2e/capita 1.88 t CO2e/capita New Zealand
2020s 15.89 t CO2e/capita 15.69 t CO2e/capita 0.1986 t CO2e/capita Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Kazakhstan or New Zealand?
Kazakhstan, at 16.04 t CO2e/capita against 14.71 t CO2e/capita in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
1.33 t CO2e/capita, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and New Zealand rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Kazakhstan ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 19th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/kazakhstan/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/kazakhstan/new-zealand/">Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.