Republic of Korea vs Libya: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Republic of Korea
12.91 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Libya
13.3 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Republic of Korea rank
22nd
Libya rank
20th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • Libya
0204060197019972024

How they compare

Libya currently reports 13.3 t CO2e/capita against 12.91 t CO2e/capita in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.39 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Libya ahead.

Republic of Korea ranks 22nd and Libya ranks 20th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea Libya Difference Ahead
1970s 3.6 t CO2e/capita 40.3 t CO2e/capita 36.7 t CO2e/capita Libya
1980s 5.66 t CO2e/capita 19.23 t CO2e/capita 13.57 t CO2e/capita Libya
1990s 9.6 t CO2e/capita 18.47 t CO2e/capita 8.87 t CO2e/capita Libya
2000s 11.95 t CO2e/capita 16.68 t CO2e/capita 4.72 t CO2e/capita Libya
2010s 14.15 t CO2e/capita 12.87 t CO2e/capita 1.28 t CO2e/capita Republic of Korea
2020s 13.32 t CO2e/capita 12.26 t CO2e/capita 1.07 t CO2e/capita Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Republic of Korea or Libya?
Libya, at 13.3 t CO2e/capita against 12.91 t CO2e/capita in Republic of Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Republic of Korea and Libya?
0.39 t CO2e/capita, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Libya?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Republic of Korea and Libya rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Republic of Korea ranks 22nd and Libya ranks 20th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs Libya: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/korea-rep/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/korea-rep/libya/">Republic of Korea vs Libya: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.