Libya vs New Zealand: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Libya
13.3 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
New Zealand
14.71 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Libya rank
20th
New Zealand rank
19th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Libya
  • New Zealand
0204060197019972024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 14.71 t CO2e/capita against 13.3 t CO2e/capita in Libya, a difference of 1.41 t CO2e/capita.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 19th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 40.3 t CO2e/capita 20.54 t CO2e/capita 19.76 t CO2e/capita Libya
1980s 19.23 t CO2e/capita 21.32 t CO2e/capita 2.08 t CO2e/capita New Zealand
1990s 18.47 t CO2e/capita 20.98 t CO2e/capita 2.51 t CO2e/capita New Zealand
2000s 16.68 t CO2e/capita 21.04 t CO2e/capita 4.37 t CO2e/capita New Zealand
2010s 12.87 t CO2e/capita 18.7 t CO2e/capita 5.83 t CO2e/capita New Zealand
2020s 12.26 t CO2e/capita 15.69 t CO2e/capita 3.43 t CO2e/capita New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Libya or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 14.71 t CO2e/capita against 13.3 t CO2e/capita in Libya as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Libya and New Zealand?
1.41 t CO2e/capita, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and New Zealand?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Libya and New Zealand rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Libya ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 19th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs New Zealand: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/libya/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/libya/new-zealand/">Libya vs New Zealand: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.