Malta vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Malta
3.94 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
3.96 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Malta rank
106th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
105th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Malta
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
2468197019972024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 3.96 t CO2e/capita against 3.94 t CO2e/capita in Malta, a difference of 0.02 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 106th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 105th of 203 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 3.06 t CO2e/capita 1.45 t CO2e/capita 1.61 t CO2e/capita Malta
1980s 5.05 t CO2e/capita 1.5 t CO2e/capita 3.55 t CO2e/capita Malta
1990s 7.05 t CO2e/capita 1.78 t CO2e/capita 5.27 t CO2e/capita Malta
2000s 7.17 t CO2e/capita 2.41 t CO2e/capita 4.76 t CO2e/capita Malta
2010s 5.6 t CO2e/capita 2.98 t CO2e/capita 2.62 t CO2e/capita Malta
2020s 4.03 t CO2e/capita 3.73 t CO2e/capita 0.3034 t CO2e/capita Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Malta or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 3.96 t CO2e/capita against 3.94 t CO2e/capita in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Malta and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.02 t CO2e/capita, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Malta and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Malta ranks 106th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 105th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/malta/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/malta/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Malta vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.