Mauritius vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Mauritius
5.19 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
5.11 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Mauritius rank
84th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
87th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Mauritius
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
12345197019972024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 5.19 t CO2e/capita against 5.11 t CO2e/capita in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.08 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 84th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 87th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 1.15 t CO2e/capita 0.8579 t CO2e/capita 0.2888 t CO2e/capita Mauritius
1980s 1.31 t CO2e/capita 0.7622 t CO2e/capita 0.5521 t CO2e/capita Mauritius
1990s 2.01 t CO2e/capita 0.7376 t CO2e/capita 1.28 t CO2e/capita Mauritius
2000s 3.19 t CO2e/capita 1.9 t CO2e/capita 1.3 t CO2e/capita Mauritius
2010s 4.33 t CO2e/capita 2.98 t CO2e/capita 1.35 t CO2e/capita Mauritius
2020s 4.8 t CO2e/capita 5.02 t CO2e/capita 0.228 t CO2e/capita Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Mauritius or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Mauritius, at 5.19 t CO2e/capita against 5.11 t CO2e/capita in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Mauritius and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.08 t CO2e/capita, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Turks and Caicos Islands?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Mauritius ranks 84th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 87th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/mauritius/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/mauritius/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Mauritius vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.