Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Rwanda
0.5857 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Solomon Islands
0.7566 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Rwanda rank
194th
Solomon Islands rank
191st

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Rwanda
  • Solomon Islands
00.250.50.7511.2197019972024

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.7566 t CO2e/capita against 0.5857 t CO2e/capita in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1709 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 194th and Solomon Islands ranks 191st of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 1.02 t CO2e/capita 0.9743 t CO2e/capita 0.0501 t CO2e/capita Rwanda
1980s 0.9083 t CO2e/capita 0.997 t CO2e/capita 0.0887 t CO2e/capita Solomon Islands
1990s 0.6914 t CO2e/capita 0.8736 t CO2e/capita 0.1822 t CO2e/capita Solomon Islands
2000s 0.5332 t CO2e/capita 0.9993 t CO2e/capita 0.4661 t CO2e/capita Solomon Islands
2010s 0.568 t CO2e/capita 0.94 t CO2e/capita 0.372 t CO2e/capita Solomon Islands
2020s 0.5913 t CO2e/capita 0.7703 t CO2e/capita 0.1789 t CO2e/capita Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Rwanda or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0.7566 t CO2e/capita against 0.5857 t CO2e/capita in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
0.1709 t CO2e/capita, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Solomon Islands rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Rwanda ranks 194th and Solomon Islands ranks 191st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/rwanda/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/rwanda/solomon-islands/">Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.