Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Sao Tome and Principe
1.04 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Uganda
1.15 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
182nd
Uganda rank
179th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Uganda
00.250.50.7511.2197019972024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 1.15 t CO2e/capita against 1.04 t CO2e/capita in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.11 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 182nd and Uganda ranks 179th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4329 t CO2e/capita 1.06 t CO2e/capita 0.6308 t CO2e/capita Uganda
1980s 0.4526 t CO2e/capita 0.9176 t CO2e/capita 0.465 t CO2e/capita Uganda
1990s 0.7594 t CO2e/capita 0.8416 t CO2e/capita 0.0821 t CO2e/capita Uganda
2000s 0.9282 t CO2e/capita 0.8886 t CO2e/capita 0.0396 t CO2e/capita Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.12 t CO2e/capita 1.14 t CO2e/capita 0.0152 t CO2e/capita Uganda
2020s 1.08 t CO2e/capita 1.15 t CO2e/capita 0.0712 t CO2e/capita Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Sao Tome and Principe or Uganda?
Uganda, at 1.15 t CO2e/capita against 1.04 t CO2e/capita in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda?
0.11 t CO2e/capita, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 182nd and Uganda ranks 179th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/sao-tome-and-principe/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/sao-tome-and-principe/uganda/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.