American Samoa vs Australia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time
- American Samoa
- Australia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 28.4% against 21.9% in American Samoa, a difference of 6.5%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times American Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was American Samoa ahead.
American Samoa ranks 140th and Australia ranks 139th of 203 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Australia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.8% | 6.7% | 0.9% | Australia |
| 2000s | 19.9% | 24.5% | 4.7% | Australia |
| 2010s | 20.0% | 31.3% | 11.3% | Australia |
| 2020s | 21.6% | 26.2% | 4.5% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, American Samoa or Australia?
- Australia, at 28.4% against 21.9% in American Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between American Samoa and Australia?
- 6.5%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Australia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do American Samoa and Australia rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
- American Samoa ranks 140th and Australia ranks 139th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change Land Use and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5) to combine different GHGs. Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.