Burkina Faso vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Burkina Faso
208.8%
in 2024
Central Europe and the Baltics
-43.7%
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
44th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
47th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
0100200199120072024

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 208.8% against -43.7% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 252.5%.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 4.8 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 44th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 47th of 203 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 15.9% -19.3% 35.2% Burkina Faso
2000s 72.8% -28.4% 101.1% Burkina Faso
2010s 152.8% -33.1% 185.9% Burkina Faso
2020s 202.3% -39.3% 241.6% Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Burkina Faso or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Burkina Faso, at 208.8% against -43.7% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Burkina Faso and Central Europe and the Baltics?
252.5%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Central Europe and the Baltics?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Burkina Faso ranks 44th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 47th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-percent-change-from-1990/burkina-faso/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-percent-change-from-1990/burkina-faso/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Burkina Faso vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)
Unit
% change from 1990
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 8,500 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change Land Use and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5) to combine different GHGs. Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.