High income vs Malawi: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time
- High income
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 223.8% against -5.7% in High income, a difference of 229.5%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 39.0 times High income's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
High income ranks 38th and Malawi ranks 36th of 47 groups.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.8% | 12.5% | 13.3% | Malawi |
| 2000s | 3.4% | 54.3% | 50.9% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 140.5% | 139.7% | Malawi |
| 2020s | -5.2% | 214.2% | 219.4% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, High income or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 223.8% against -5.7% in High income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between High income and Malawi?
- 229.5%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Malawi?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do High income and Malawi rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
- High income ranks 38th and Malawi ranks 36th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change Land Use and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5) to combine different GHGs. Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.