Kiribati vs Latin America & Caribbean: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Kiribati
248.0%
in 2024
Latin America & Caribbean
71.8%
in 2024
Kiribati rank
30th
Latin America & Caribbean rank
32nd

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Kiribati
  • Latin America & Caribbean
050100150200250199120072024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 248.0% against 71.8% in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 176.2%.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 3.5 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Latin America & Caribbean ahead.

Kiribati ranks 30th and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 32nd of 203 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Latin America & Caribbean in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Latin America & Caribbean Difference Ahead
1990s 8.4% 14.4% 6.0% Latin America & Caribbean
2000s 122.4% 39.7% 82.7% Kiribati
2010s 180.2% 64.5% 115.7% Kiribati
2020s 235.7% 66.7% 169.1% Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Kiribati or Latin America & Caribbean?
Kiribati, at 248.0% against 71.8% in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Kiribati and Latin America & Caribbean?
176.2%, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Latin America & Caribbean?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Latin America & Caribbean rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Kiribati ranks 30th and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 32nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Latin America & Caribbean: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-percent-change-from-1990/kiribati/latin-america-and-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-percent-change-from-1990/kiribati/latin-america-and-caribbean/">Kiribati vs Latin America & Caribbean: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)
Unit
% change from 1990
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 8,500 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change Land Use and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5) to combine different GHGs. Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.