Late-demographic dividend vs Mali: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time
- Late-demographic dividend
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 300.7% against 132.4% in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 168.3%.
That makes Mali's figure about 2.3 times Late-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.
Late-demographic dividend ranks 18th and Mali ranks 15th of 47 groups.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Late-demographic dividend | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2% | 8.6% | 8.3% | Mali |
| 2000s | 34.0% | 65.1% | 31.1% | Mali |
| 2010s | 96.8% | 172.2% | 75.4% | Mali |
| 2020s | 124.1% | 278.3% | 154.2% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Late-demographic dividend or Mali?
- Mali, at 300.7% against 132.4% in Late-demographic dividend as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Late-demographic dividend and Mali?
- 168.3%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Mali?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Late-demographic dividend and Mali rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
- Late-demographic dividend ranks 18th and Mali ranks 15th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change Land Use and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5) to combine different GHGs. Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.