Low income vs Mongolia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time
- Low income
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 248.7% against 86.7% in Low income, a difference of 162.0%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.9 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mongolia ahead.
Low income ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 29th of 47 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Low income averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.3% | -3.9% | 6.2% | Low income |
| 2000s | 25.9% | 0.7% | 25.2% | Low income |
| 2010s | 52.7% | 92.2% | 39.5% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 79.8% | 176.3% | 96.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Low income or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 248.7% against 86.7% in Low income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Low income and Mongolia?
- 162.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Low income and Mongolia rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
- Low income ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 29th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change Land Use and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5) to combine different GHGs. Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.