Naoero vs Rwanda: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time
- Naoero
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 47.2% against 40.0% in Naoero, a difference of 7.2%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Naoero's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Naoero ahead.
Naoero ranks 126th and Rwanda ranks 123rd of 203 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.9% | -12.6% | 21.5% | Naoero |
| 2000s | 10.0% | -15.2% | 25.2% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 15.6% | 3.4% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 40.0% | 42.4% | 2.4% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Naoero or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 47.2% against 40.0% in Naoero as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Naoero and Rwanda?
- 7.2%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Naoero and Rwanda rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
- Naoero ranks 126th and Rwanda ranks 123rd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Change Land Use and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5) to combine different GHGs. Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.