China vs Zimbabwe: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

China
97.6%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
97.8%
in 2024
China rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
140th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • China
  • Zimbabwe
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 97.8% against 97.6% in China, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.

China ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 98.6% 97.8% 0.9% China
2010s 98.1% 97.8% 0.3% China
2020s 97.7% 97.8% 0.1% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, China or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 97.8% against 97.6% in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between China and Zimbabwe?
0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do China and Zimbabwe rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
China ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zimbabwe: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/china/zimbabwe/">China vs Zimbabwe: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.