Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population was 97.8% in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
97.8%
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
140th
of 188 countries
All-time high
97.8%
in 2024
All-time low
97.8%
in 2000
Years of data
25
2000–2024

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe, 2000–2024

0204060801002000201220242000: 97.8 %2001: 97.8 %2002: 97.8 %2003: 97.8 %2004: 97.8 %2005: 97.8 %2006: 97.8 %2007: 97.8 %2008: 97.8 %2009: 97.8 %2010: 97.8 %2011: 97.8 %2012: 97.8 %2013: 97.8 %2014: 97.8 %2015: 97.8 %2016: 97.8 %2017: 97.8 %2018: 97.8 %2019: 97.8 %2020: 97.8 %2021: 97.8 %2022: 97.8 %2023: 97.8 %2024: 97.8 %

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe is 97.8%, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe peaked at 97.8% in 2024 and was at its lowest, 97.8%, in 2000.

That places Zimbabwe 140th out of 188 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe, 2000 to 2024.
Year % Change
2000 97.8% —
2001 97.8% +0.0%
2002 97.8% +0.0%
2003 97.8% +0.0%
2004 97.8% +0.0%
2005 97.8% +0.0%
2006 97.8% +0.0%
2007 97.8% +0.0%
2008 97.8% +0.0%
2009 97.8% +0.0%
2010 97.8% +0.0%
2011 97.8% +0.0%
2012 97.8% +0.0%
2013 97.8% +0.0%
2014 97.8% +0.0%
2015 97.8% +0.0%
2016 97.8% +0.0%
2017 97.8% +0.0%
2018 97.8% +0.0%
2019 97.8% +0.0%
2020 97.8% +0.0%
2021 97.8% +0.0%
2022 97.8% +0.0%
2023 97.8% +0.0%
2024 97.8% +0.0%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's 97.8% is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 98.5%, 99% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's 97.8% is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 96.6%, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 97.8% 97.8% 97.8% 10
2010s 97.8% 97.8% 97.8% 10
2020s 97.8% 97.8% 97.8% 5

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 137 Cuba 98.1% compare
  2. 138 Sri Lanka 97.9% compare
  3. 139 North Korea 97.8% compare
  4. 141 Gabon 97.7% compare
  5. 142 China 97.6% compare
  6. 143 Pakistan 97.5% compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More environment data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe?
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe was 97.8% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 97.8% in 2024.
What is the lowest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 97.8% in 2000.
How does Zimbabwe rank for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Zimbabwe ranks 140th out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
Is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/zimbabwe/">Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.