Equatorial Guinea vs Madagascar: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Equatorial Guinea
81.7%
in 2017
Madagascar
86.5%
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
187th
Madagascar rank
185th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Madagascar
020406080200020122024

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 86.5% against 81.7% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4.8%.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Madagascar ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th and Madagascar ranks 185th of 188 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Madagascar Difference Ahead
2000s 72.0% 76.7% 4.7% Madagascar
2010s 80.8% 81.2% 0.4% Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Equatorial Guinea or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 86.5% against 81.7% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar?
4.8%, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th and Madagascar ranks 185th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Madagascar: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/equatorial-guinea/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/equatorial-guinea/madagascar/">Equatorial Guinea vs Madagascar: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.