Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population was 81.7% in 2017. ▲ Rising

Latest (2017)
81.7%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
187th
of 188 countries
All-time high
81.7%
in 2013
All-time low
66.9%
in 2000
Years of data
18
2000–2017

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea, 2000–2017

0204060802000200820172000: 66.9 %2001: 68 %2002: 69.2 %2003: 70.3 %2004: 71.5 %2005: 72.6 %2006: 73.7 %2007: 74.9 %2008: 76 %2009: 77.1 %2010: 78.3 %2011: 79.4 %2012: 80.5 %2013: 81.7 %2014: 81.7 %2015: 81.7 %2016: 81.7 %2017: 81.7 %

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea is 81.7%, measured in 2017. That is the highest value across all 18 years on record.

The figure is up 9.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 81.7% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 66.9%, in 2000.

That places Equatorial Guinea 187th out of 188 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 18 years of available data.

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea, 2000 to 2017.
Year % Change
2000 66.9% —
2001 68.0% +1.7%
2002 69.2% +1.7%
2003 70.3% +1.6%
2004 71.5% +1.6%
2005 72.6% +1.6%
2006 73.7% +1.6%
2007 74.9% +1.5%
2008 76.0% +1.5%
2009 77.1% +1.5%
2010 78.3% +1.5%
2011 79.4% +1.5%
2012 80.5% +1.4%
2013 81.7% +1.4%
2014 81.7% +0.0%
2015 81.7% +0.0%
2016 81.7% +0.0%
2017 81.7% +0.0%

Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries

  • Equatorial Guinea's 81.7% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 99.7%, 82% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Equatorial Guinea's 81.7% is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 96.6%, 85% of the median. (47 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 72.0% 66.9% 77.1% 10
2010s 80.8% 78.3% 81.7% 8

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea

  1. 184 South Sudan 87.4% compare
  2. 185 Madagascar 86.5% compare
  3. 186 Central African Republic 83.7% compare
  4. 188 Benin 81.4% compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More environment data for Equatorial Guinea

All data for Equatorial Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea?
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea was 81.7% in 2017, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 81.7% in 2013.
What is the lowest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 66.9% in 2000.
How does Equatorial Guinea rank for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th out of 188 countries with data for 2017.
Is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/equatorial-guinea/">Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Equatorial Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.