Hong Kong vs Montenegro: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Hong Kong
100.0%
in 2024
Montenegro
100.0%
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Montenegro
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 99.3% 99.6% 0.2% Montenegro
2010s 99.8% 99.9% 0.1% Montenegro
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Hong Kong or Montenegro?
Hong Kong, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Hong Kong and Montenegro?
0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Montenegro?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Montenegro rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Hong Kong ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Montenegro: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/hong-kong-sar-china/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/hong-kong-sar-china/montenegro/">Hong Kong vs Montenegro: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.