Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Montenegro

Montenegro: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population was 100.0% in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
100.0%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
100.0%
in 2016
All-time low
99.5%
in 2006
Years of data
19
2006–2024

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Montenegro, 2006–2024

0204060801002006201520242006: 99.5 %2007: 99.5 %2008: 99.6 %2009: 99.6 %2010: 99.7 %2011: 99.7 %2012: 99.8 %2013: 99.9 %2014: 99.9 %2015: 100 %2016: 100 %2017: 100 %2018: 100 %2019: 100 %2020: 100 %2021: 100 %2022: 100 %2023: 100 %2024: 100 %

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.

Analysis

Montenegro recorded 100.0% for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in 2024. That is the highest value across all 19 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Montenegro peaked at 100.0% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 99.5%, in 2006.

That places Montenegro 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 99.6% 99.5% 99.6% 4
2010s 99.9% 99.7% 100.0% 10
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5

Countries ranked near Montenegro

  1. 1 Afghanistan 100.0% compare
  2. 1 Andorra 100.0% compare
  3. 1 Austria 100.0% compare
  4. 1 Azerbaijan 100.0% compare
  5. 1 Belgium 100.0% compare
  6. 1 Belize 100.0% compare
  7. 1 Bermuda 100.0% compare
  8. 1 Brazil 100.0% compare
  9. 1 Cape Verde 100.0% compare
  10. 1 Colombia 100.0% compare
  11. 1 Costa Rica 100.0% compare
  12. 1 Denmark 100.0% compare
  13. 1 East Timor 100.0% compare
  14. 1 Ecuador 100.0% compare
  15. 1 El Salvador 100.0% compare
  16. 1 Estonia 100.0% compare
  17. 1 Falkland Islands 100.0% compare
  18. 1 Finland 100.0% compare
  19. 1 France 100.0% compare
  20. 1 Germany 100.0% compare
  21. 1 Ghana 100.0% compare
  22. 1 Gibraltar 100.0% compare
  23. 1 Greece 100.0% compare
  24. 1 Honduras 100.0% compare
  25. 1 Hong Kong 100.0% compare
  26. 1 Hungary 100.0% compare
  27. 1 Iceland 100.0% compare
  28. 1 Iraq 100.0% compare
  29. 1 Israel 100.0% compare
  30. 1 Kazakhstan 100.0% compare
  31. 1 Kuwait 100.0% compare
  32. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100.0% compare
  33. 1 Laos 100.0% compare
  34. 1 Lithuania 100.0% compare
  35. 1 Macao 100.0% compare
  36. 1 Mauritius 100.0% compare
  37. 1 Mexico 100.0% compare
  38. 1 Monaco 100.0% compare
  39. 1 Netherlands 100.0% compare
  40. 1 New Zealand 100.0% compare
  41. 1 Norway 100.0% compare
  42. 1 Oman 100.0% compare
  43. 1 Palestine 100.0% compare
  44. 1 Panama 100.0% compare
  45. 1 Paraguay 100.0% compare
  46. 1 Romania 100.0% compare
  47. 1 Saint Barthelemy 100.0% compare
  48. 1 Samoa 100.0% compare
  49. 1 San Marino 100.0% compare
  50. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100.0% compare
  51. 1 Singapore 100.0% compare
  52. 1 Slovakia 100.0% compare
  53. 1 Switzerland 100.0% compare
  54. 1 Thailand 100.0% compare
  55. 1 United Arab Emirates 100.0% compare
  56. 1 United Kingdom 100.0% compare
  57. 1 Uruguay 100.0% compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More environment data for Montenegro

All data for Montenegro →

Frequently asked questions

What is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Montenegro?
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Montenegro was 100.0% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Montenegro?
The highest recorded value was 100.0% in 2016.
What is the lowest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Montenegro?
The lowest recorded value was 99.5% in 2006.
How does Montenegro rank for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Montenegro ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
Is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population rising or falling in Montenegro?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Montenegro data come from?
The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.