Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine

Palestine: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population was 100.0% in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
100.0%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
100.0%
in 2015
All-time low
94.1%
in 2000
Years of data
25
2000–2024

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine, 2000–2024

0204060801002000201220242000: 94.1 %2001: 94.5 %2002: 94.9 %2003: 95.3 %2004: 95.7 %2005: 96.1 %2006: 96.5 %2007: 96.9 %2008: 97.3 %2009: 97.7 %2010: 98.1 %2011: 98.4 %2012: 98.8 %2013: 99.2 %2014: 99.6 %2015: 100 %2016: 100 %2017: 100 %2018: 100 %2019: 100 %2020: 100 %2021: 100 %2022: 100 %2023: 100 %2024: 100 %

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2024, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine stood at 100.0%. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine peaked at 100.0% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 94.1%, in 2000.

Palestine ranks 1st of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 25 years of available data.

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine, year by year

Annual values for Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine, 2000 to 2024.
Year % Change
2000 94.1%
2001 94.5% +0.4%
2002 94.9% +0.4%
2003 95.3% +0.4%
2004 95.7% +0.4%
2005 96.1% +0.4%
2006 96.5% +0.4%
2007 96.9% +0.4%
2008 97.3% +0.4%
2009 97.7% +0.4%
2010 98.1% +0.4%
2011 98.4% +0.4%
2012 98.8% +0.4%
2013 99.2% +0.4%
2014 99.6% +0.4%
2015 100.0% +0.4%
2016 100.0% +0.0%
2017 100.0% +0.0%
2018 100.0% +0.0%
2019 100.0% +0.0%
2020 100.0% +0.0%
2021 100.0% +0.0%
2022 100.0% +0.0%
2023 100.0% +0.0%
2024 100.0% +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 95.9% 94.1% 97.7% 10
2010s 99.4% 98.1% 100.0% 10
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5

Countries ranked near Palestine

  1. 1 Afghanistan 100.0% compare
  2. 1 Andorra 100.0% compare
  3. 1 Austria 100.0% compare
  4. 1 Azerbaijan 100.0% compare
  5. 1 Belgium 100.0% compare
  6. 1 Belize 100.0% compare
  7. 1 Bermuda 100.0% compare
  8. 1 Brazil 100.0% compare
  9. 1 Cape Verde 100.0% compare
  10. 1 Colombia 100.0% compare
  11. 1 Costa Rica 100.0% compare
  12. 1 Denmark 100.0% compare
  13. 1 East Timor 100.0% compare
  14. 1 Ecuador 100.0% compare
  15. 1 El Salvador 100.0% compare
  16. 1 Estonia 100.0% compare
  17. 1 Falkland Islands 100.0% compare
  18. 1 Finland 100.0% compare
  19. 1 France 100.0% compare
  20. 1 Germany 100.0% compare
  21. 1 Ghana 100.0% compare
  22. 1 Gibraltar 100.0% compare
  23. 1 Greece 100.0% compare
  24. 1 Honduras 100.0% compare
  25. 1 Hong Kong 100.0% compare
  26. 1 Hungary 100.0% compare
  27. 1 Iceland 100.0% compare
  28. 1 Iraq 100.0% compare
  29. 1 Israel 100.0% compare
  30. 1 Kazakhstan 100.0% compare
  31. 1 Kuwait 100.0% compare
  32. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100.0% compare
  33. 1 Laos 100.0% compare
  34. 1 Lithuania 100.0% compare
  35. 1 Luxembourg 100.0% compare
  36. 1 Macao 100.0% compare
  37. 1 Malta 100.0% compare
  38. 1 Mauritius 100.0% compare
  39. 1 Mexico 100.0% compare
  40. 1 Monaco 100.0% compare
  41. 1 Montenegro 100.0% compare
  42. 1 Netherlands 100.0% compare
  43. 1 New Zealand 100.0% compare
  44. 1 Norway 100.0% compare
  45. 1 Oman 100.0% compare
  46. 1 Panama 100.0% compare
  47. 1 Paraguay 100.0% compare
  48. 1 Romania 100.0% compare
  49. 1 Saint Barthelemy 100.0% compare
  50. 1 Samoa 100.0% compare
  51. 1 San Marino 100.0% compare
  52. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100.0% compare
  53. 1 Singapore 100.0% compare
  54. 1 Slovakia 100.0% compare
  55. 1 Switzerland 100.0% compare
  56. 1 Thailand 100.0% compare
  57. 1 United Arab Emirates 100.0% compare
  58. 1 United Kingdom 100.0% compare
  59. 1 Uruguay 100.0% compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More environment data for Palestine

All data for Palestine →

Frequently asked questions

What is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine?
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine was 100.0% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Palestine?
The highest recorded value was 100.0% in 2015.
What is the lowest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Palestine?
The lowest recorded value was 94.1% in 2000.
How does Palestine rank for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Palestine ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
Is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population rising or falling in Palestine?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Palestine data come from?
The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/west-bank-and-gaza/">Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Palestine</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.