Timor-Leste vs Palestine, State of: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Timor-Leste
100.0%
in 2024
Palestine, State of
100.0%
in 2024
Timor-Leste rank
1st
Palestine, State of rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Timor-Leste
  • Palestine, State of
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.

Timor-Leste ranks 1st and Palestine, State of ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Timor-Leste Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2000s 79.9% 96.3% 16.4% Palestine, State of
2010s 90.6% 99.4% 8.8% Palestine, State of
2020s 99.0% 100.0% 1.0% Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Timor-Leste or Palestine, State of?
Timor-Leste, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Timor-Leste and Palestine, State of?
0.0%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and Palestine, State of?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Timor-Leste and Palestine, State of rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Timor-Leste ranks 1st and Palestine, State of ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Timor-Leste vs Palestine, State of: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/timor-leste/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/timor-leste/west-bank-and-gaza/">Timor-Leste vs Palestine, State of: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.