Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor

East Timor: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population was 100.0% in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
100.0%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
100.0%
in 2023
All-time low
75.8%
in 2002
Years of data
23
2002–2024

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor, 2002–2024

0204060801002002201320242002: 75.8 %2003: 77 %2004: 78.1 %2005: 79.3 %2006: 80.5 %2007: 81.7 %2008: 82.9 %2009: 84.1 %2010: 85.3 %2011: 86.5 %2012: 87.7 %2013: 88.9 %2014: 90.1 %2015: 91.2 %2016: 92.4 %2017: 93.6 %2018: 94.8 %2019: 96 %2020: 97.2 %2021: 98.4 %2022: 99.6 %2023: 100 %2024: 100 %

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor is 100.0%, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 23 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 11.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor peaked at 100.0% in 2023 and was at its lowest, 75.8%, in 2002.

That places East Timor 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 79.9% 75.8% 84.1% 8
2010s 90.6% 85.3% 96.0% 10
2020s 99.0% 97.2% 100.0% 5

Countries ranked near East Timor

  1. 1 Afghanistan 100.0% compare
  2. 1 Andorra 100.0% compare
  3. 1 Austria 100.0% compare
  4. 1 Azerbaijan 100.0% compare
  5. 1 Belgium 100.0% compare
  6. 1 Belize 100.0% compare
  7. 1 Bermuda 100.0% compare
  8. 1 Brazil 100.0% compare
  9. 1 Cape Verde 100.0% compare
  10. 1 Colombia 100.0% compare
  11. 1 Costa Rica 100.0% compare
  12. 1 Denmark 100.0% compare
  13. 1 Ecuador 100.0% compare
  14. 1 El Salvador 100.0% compare
  15. 1 Estonia 100.0% compare
  16. 1 Falkland Islands 100.0% compare
  17. 1 Finland 100.0% compare
  18. 1 France 100.0% compare
  19. 1 Germany 100.0% compare
  20. 1 Ghana 100.0% compare
  21. 1 Gibraltar 100.0% compare
  22. 1 Greece 100.0% compare
  23. 1 Honduras 100.0% compare
  24. 1 Hong Kong 100.0% compare
  25. 1 Hungary 100.0% compare
  26. 1 Iceland 100.0% compare
  27. 1 Iraq 100.0% compare
  28. 1 Israel 100.0% compare
  29. 1 Kazakhstan 100.0% compare
  30. 1 Kuwait 100.0% compare
  31. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100.0% compare
  32. 1 Laos 100.0% compare
  33. 1 Lithuania 100.0% compare
  34. 1 Macao 100.0% compare
  35. 1 Mauritius 100.0% compare
  36. 1 Mexico 100.0% compare
  37. 1 Monaco 100.0% compare
  38. 1 Montenegro 100.0% compare
  39. 1 Netherlands 100.0% compare
  40. 1 New Zealand 100.0% compare
  41. 1 Norway 100.0% compare
  42. 1 Oman 100.0% compare
  43. 1 Palestine 100.0% compare
  44. 1 Panama 100.0% compare
  45. 1 Paraguay 100.0% compare
  46. 1 Romania 100.0% compare
  47. 1 Saint Barthelemy 100.0% compare
  48. 1 Samoa 100.0% compare
  49. 1 San Marino 100.0% compare
  50. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100.0% compare
  51. 1 Singapore 100.0% compare
  52. 1 Slovakia 100.0% compare
  53. 1 Switzerland 100.0% compare
  54. 1 Thailand 100.0% compare
  55. 1 United Arab Emirates 100.0% compare
  56. 1 United Kingdom 100.0% compare
  57. 1 Uruguay 100.0% compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More environment data for East Timor

All data for East Timor →

Frequently asked questions

What is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor?
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor was 100.0% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in East Timor?
The highest recorded value was 100.0% in 2023.
What is the lowest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in East Timor?
The lowest recorded value was 75.8% in 2002.
How does East Timor rank for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
East Timor ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
Is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population rising or falling in East Timor?
Over the last ten years it is up 11.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this East Timor data come from?
The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.