Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor
East Timor: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population was 100.0% in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
100.0%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
100.0%
in 2023
All-time low
75.8%
in 2002
Years of data
23
2002–2024
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor, 2002–2024
Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor is 100.0%, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 23 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 11.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor peaked at 100.0% in 2023 and was at its lowest, 75.8%, in 2002.
That places East Timor 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 75.8% | — |
| 2003 | 77.0% | +1.6% |
| 2004 | 78.1% | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 79.3% | +1.5% |
| 2006 | 80.5% | +1.5% |
| 2007 | 81.7% | +1.5% |
| 2008 | 82.9% | +1.5% |
| 2009 | 84.1% | +1.4% |
| 2010 | 85.3% | +1.4% |
| 2011 | 86.5% | +1.4% |
| 2012 | 87.7% | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 88.9% | +1.4% |
| 2014 | 90.1% | +1.3% |
| 2015 | 91.2% | +1.3% |
| 2016 | 92.4% | +1.3% |
| 2017 | 93.6% | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 94.8% | +1.3% |
| 2019 | 96.0% | +1.3% |
| 2020 | 97.2% | +1.2% |
| 2021 | 98.4% | +1.2% |
| 2022 | 99.6% | +1.2% |
| 2023 | 100.0% | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
East Timor compared with similar countries
- East Timor's 100.0% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 98.5%, 1.0× the median. (44 countries reporting)
- East Timor's 100.0% is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 99.4%, 1.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.9% | 75.8% | 84.1% | 8 |
| 2010s | 90.6% | 85.3% | 96.0% | 10 |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 97.2% | 100.0% | 5 |
Countries ranked near East Timor
- 1 Afghanistan 100.0% compare
- 1 Andorra 100.0% compare
- 1 Austria 100.0% compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 100.0% compare
- 1 Belgium 100.0% compare
- 1 Belize 100.0% compare
- 1 Bermuda 100.0% compare
- 1 Brazil 100.0% compare
- 1 Cape Verde 100.0% compare
- 1 Colombia 100.0% compare
- 1 Costa Rica 100.0% compare
- 1 Denmark 100.0% compare
- 1 Ecuador 100.0% compare
- 1 El Salvador 100.0% compare
- 1 Estonia 100.0% compare
- 1 Falkland Islands 100.0% compare
- 1 Finland 100.0% compare
- 1 France 100.0% compare
- 1 Germany 100.0% compare
- 1 Ghana 100.0% compare
- 1 Gibraltar 100.0% compare
- 1 Greece 100.0% compare
- 1 Honduras 100.0% compare
- 1 Hong Kong 100.0% compare
- 1 Hungary 100.0% compare
- 1 Iceland 100.0% compare
- 1 Iraq 100.0% compare
- 1 Israel 100.0% compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 100.0% compare
- 1 Kuwait 100.0% compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 100.0% compare
- 1 Laos 100.0% compare
- 1 Lithuania 100.0% compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100.0% compare
- 1 Macao 100.0% compare
- 1 Malta 100.0% compare
- 1 Mauritius 100.0% compare
- 1 Mexico 100.0% compare
- 1 Monaco 100.0% compare
- 1 Montenegro 100.0% compare
- 1 Netherlands 100.0% compare
- 1 New Zealand 100.0% compare
- 1 Norway 100.0% compare
- 1 Oman 100.0% compare
- 1 Palestine 100.0% compare
- 1 Panama 100.0% compare
- 1 Paraguay 100.0% compare
- 1 Romania 100.0% compare
- 1 Saint Barthelemy 100.0% compare
- 1 Samoa 100.0% compare
- 1 San Marino 100.0% compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100.0% compare
- 1 Singapore 100.0% compare
- 1 Slovakia 100.0% compare
- 1 Switzerland 100.0% compare
- 1 Thailand 100.0% compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100.0% compare
- 1 United Kingdom 100.0% compare
- 1 Uruguay 100.0% compare
More environment data for East Timor
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 3.36 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate 3.32 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e) -3.97 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor?
- Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in East Timor was 100.0% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in East Timor?
- The highest recorded value was 100.0% in 2023.
- What is the lowest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in East Timor?
- The lowest recorded value was 75.8% in 2002.
- How does East Timor rank for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
- East Timor ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
- Is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population rising or falling in East Timor?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this East Timor data come from?
- The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.