Kyrgyzstan vs Timor-Leste: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Kyrgyzstan
100.0%
in 2024
Timor-Leste
100.0%
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
1st
Timor-Leste rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Timor-Leste
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 96.5% 79.9% 16.6% Kyrgyzstan
2010s 98.6% 90.6% 7.9% Kyrgyzstan
2020s 99.9% 99.0% 0.9% Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Kyrgyzstan or Timor-Leste?
Kyrgyzstan, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste?
0.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Timor-Leste rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 1st and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Timor-Leste: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/kyrgyz-republic/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/kyrgyz-republic/timor-leste/">Kyrgyzstan vs Timor-Leste: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.