Lithuania vs Palestine: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Lithuania
100.0%
in 2024
Palestine
100.0%
in 2024
Lithuania rank
1st
Palestine rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Lithuania
  • Palestine
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Palestine, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 1st and Palestine ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 97.5% 95.9% 1.7% Lithuania
2010s 99.2% 99.4% 0.2% Palestine
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Lithuania or Palestine?
Lithuania, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Lithuania and Palestine?
0.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Palestine?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Palestine rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Lithuania ranks 1st and Palestine ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Palestine: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/lithuania/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/lithuania/west-bank-and-gaza/">Lithuania vs Palestine: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.