Montenegro vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Montenegro
100.0%
in 2024
New Zealand
100.0%
in 2024
Montenegro rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Montenegro
  • New Zealand
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 19 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Montenegro ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 188 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 99.6% 100.0% 0.4% New Zealand
2010s 99.9% 100.0% 0.1% New Zealand
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Montenegro or New Zealand?
Montenegro, at 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Montenegro and New Zealand?
0.0%, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and New Zealand?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Montenegro and New Zealand rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Montenegro ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/montenegro/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/montenegro/new-zealand/">Montenegro vs New Zealand: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.