Azerbaijan vs Eswatini: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Azerbaijan
76.5%
in 2024
Eswatini
76.9%
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
49th
Eswatini rank
48th
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Azerbaijan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 76.9% against 76.5% in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 49th and Eswatini ranks 48th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.6% | 74.6% | 0.0% | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 75.7% | 78.9% | 3.2% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 76.5% | 77.4% | 0.9% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Azerbaijan or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 76.9% against 76.5% in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Azerbaijan and Eswatini?
- 0.4%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Eswatini?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Eswatini rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
- Azerbaijan ranks 49th and Eswatini ranks 48th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.