Benin vs Nepal: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Benin
28.4%
in 2024
Nepal
23.6%
in 2024
Benin rank
97th
Nepal rank
99th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Benin
  • Nepal
010203040200020122024

How they compare

Benin currently reports 28.4% against 23.6% in Nepal, a difference of 4.8%.

That makes Benin's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.

Benin ranks 97th and Nepal ranks 99th of 105 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 28.0% 37.8% 9.8% Nepal
2010s 28.2% 33.6% 5.4% Nepal
2020s 28.4% 23.9% 4.5% Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Benin or Nepal?
Benin, at 28.4% against 23.6% in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Benin and Nepal?
4.8%, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Nepal?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Benin and Nepal rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Benin ranks 97th and Nepal ranks 99th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.