Brazil vs Georgia: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Brazil
90.7%
in 2024
Georgia
89.3%
in 2024
Brazil rank
32nd
Georgia rank
33rd
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Brazil
- Georgia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 90.7% against 89.3% in Georgia, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 32nd and Georgia ranks 33rd of 105 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.6% | 78.3% | 4.3% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 84.8% | 82.7% | 2.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 89.4% | 89.2% | 0.2% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Brazil or Georgia?
- Brazil, at 90.7% against 89.3% in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Brazil and Georgia?
- 1.4%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Georgia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Georgia rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
- Brazil ranks 32nd and Georgia ranks 33rd of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.