Brazil vs Uruguay: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Brazil
90.7%
in 2024
Uruguay
94.6%
in 2024
Brazil rank
32nd
Uruguay rank
29th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Brazil
  • Uruguay
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 94.6% against 90.7% in Brazil, a difference of 3.9%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 32nd and Uruguay ranks 29th of 105 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 82.6% 94.0% 11.5% Uruguay
2010s 84.8% 94.4% 9.6% Uruguay
2020s 89.4% 94.6% 5.2% Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Brazil or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 94.6% against 90.7% in Brazil as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Brazil and Uruguay?
3.9%, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uruguay?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Uruguay rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Brazil ranks 32nd and Uruguay ranks 29th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.