Chad vs Tuvalu: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Chad
17.6%
in 2024
Tuvalu
10.4%
in 2024
Chad rank
102nd
Tuvalu rank
105th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Chad
  • Tuvalu
05101520200020122024

How they compare

Chad currently reports 17.6% against 10.4% in Tuvalu, a difference of 7.2%.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.7 times Tuvalu's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 102nd and Tuvalu ranks 105th of 105 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Tuvalu Difference Ahead
2000s 15.5% 10.4% 5.1% Chad
2010s 16.8% 10.4% 6.4% Chad
2020s 17.6% 10.4% 7.2% Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Chad or Tuvalu?
Chad, at 17.6% against 10.4% in Tuvalu as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Chad and Tuvalu?
7.2%, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tuvalu?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Chad and Tuvalu rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Chad ranks 102nd and Tuvalu ranks 105th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.