Ecuador vs North Macedonia: Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source

Ecuador
82.35
in 2024
North Macedonia
84.73
in 2024
Ecuador rank
39th
North Macedonia rank
37th

Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source over time

  • Ecuador
  • North Macedonia
020406080200020122024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 84.73 against 82.35 in Ecuador, a difference of 2.38.

Across all 25 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 39th and North Macedonia ranks 37th of 105 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 71.19 84.72 13.53 North Macedonia
2010s 74.76 84.72 9.97 North Macedonia
2020s 80.9 84.73 3.83 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source, Ecuador or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 84.73 against 82.35 in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source between Ecuador and North Macedonia?
2.38, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and North Macedonia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and North Macedonia rank globally for urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source?
Ecuador ranks 39th and North Macedonia ranks 37th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed