Ecuador vs Palestine: Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source
Ecuador
82.35
in 2024
Palestine
81.86
in 2024
Ecuador rank
39th
Palestine rank
40th
Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source over time
- Ecuador
- Palestine
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 82.35 against 81.86 in Palestine, a difference of 0.49.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Palestine ahead.
Ecuador ranks 39th and Palestine ranks 40th of 105 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.19 | 78.49 | 7.3 | Palestine |
| 2010s | 74.76 | 81.38 | 6.62 | Palestine |
| 2020s | 80.9 | 81.86 | 0.9578 | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source, Ecuador or Palestine?
- Ecuador, at 82.35 against 81.86 in Palestine as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source between Ecuador and Palestine?
- 0.49, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Palestine?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Palestine rank globally for urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source?
- Ecuador ranks 39th and Palestine ranks 40th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.