Eswatini vs Guyana: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Eswatini
76.9%
in 2024
Guyana
76.0%
in 2024
Eswatini rank
48th
Guyana rank
50th
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Eswatini
- Guyana
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 76.9% against 76.0% in Guyana, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guyana ahead.
Eswatini ranks 48th and Guyana ranks 50th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Guyana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.6% | 75.2% | 0.7% | Guyana |
| 2010s | 78.9% | 75.7% | 3.2% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 77.4% | 76.0% | 1.3% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Eswatini or Guyana?
- Eswatini, at 76.9% against 76.0% in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Eswatini and Guyana?
- 0.9%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
- Eswatini ranks 48th and Guyana ranks 50th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.