Ethiopia vs Uganda: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Ethiopia
38.4%
in 2024
Uganda
40.0%
in 2024
Ethiopia rank
90th
Uganda rank
88th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Uganda
010203040200020122024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 40.0% against 38.4% in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.6%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 90th and Uganda ranks 88th of 105 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 36.3% 22.0% 14.2% Ethiopia
2010s 37.4% 34.2% 3.2% Ethiopia
2020s 38.2% 39.9% 1.7% Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Ethiopia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 40.0% against 38.4% in Ethiopia as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Ethiopia and Uganda?
1.6%, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Uganda?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Ethiopia and Uganda rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Ethiopia ranks 90th and Uganda ranks 88th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.